AI is the future, and the future is now, at least it is one of next year's top priorities for every bank treasurer at large and small banks and credit unions. The question is how? How do you implement AI? The answer to that question is another question: what do you want to do with it? Answering that question is not the IT department's or the intern's responsibility. The use cases need leadership at the top to decide and see implementation through if pilot projects are ever to yield the productivity gains the technology promises.

Now that the U.S. Mint stopped making pennies, repo traders will need to find some other coin to pick up in front of a steamroller. Meanwhile, bank treasurers cannot help but notice the growing volatility in the repo market, with SOFR frequently spiking above the rate on the RRP. The Fed is undoubtedly taking the stresses in the market seriously and announced that it would end QT next month. But notably, QT had a limited impact on reserve balances compared to the Government shutdown.

Connecting the dots is an age-old pastime, but the dots that bank treasurers see these days are very confusing and challenging to connect, at least without some form of AI. Even the voting members of the FOMC are not sure what picture they see. Amid significant market volatility and economic uncertainty, bank treasurers are just trying to keep their eyes on the horizon and keep their net interest margins steady.

It has been two and a half years since the regional bank failures, and Congress has not done anything to fix deposit insurance. The FDIC published a report on May 1, 2023, detailing the options before Congress for deposit insurance reform, but none of the choices are without tough tradeoffs. The public wants higher deposit insurance coverage, but that choice means banks will pay higher deposit insurance premiums, and higher premiums mean less profit. Congress needs to vote, and its vote is overdue. The last time Congress voted on deposit insurance to increase the cap to $250,000 was fifteen years ago.

Bank treasurers remain wary of stablecoins, but there is good news and bad news. First, the bad news is that instant payment systems, where volumes are growing by leaps and bounds and which stablecoins are one type, are going to increase the mix of low-yielding HQLA that banks will need to hold on their balance sheets, to the detriment of their NIMs. The good news is that first, no one in their right mind sits in cash, so the risk to deposits seems overdone. But the even better news is that global cross-border payment flows neared $1 quadrillion last year, and the average size of a single payment is often over $50 million, well beyond what other instant payment methods like FedNow and RTP typically handle, and thus an excellent use case for stablecoins. The beauty of these coins from an issuer’s perspective is that they are managed off-balance sheet by a third party, while the issuer earns 100% of the interest generated from the assets it places in the reserve fund until the holder cashes the token.

Bank treasurers may not like accounting, but they know that debits and credits always matter in a financial transaction. That is why it does not take a GENIUS Act to appreciate the economic opportunities Congress gave the financial industry this month. Instead, it requires accounting and an understanding of how debits and credits work in its favor. Basic accounting common sense also helps explain why the Fed can never return to the balance sheet it once had before the GFC and can never revert to the days when the law prohibited it from paying IORB, despite political calls to the contrary.

Bank examiners, as depicted in the 1946 movie, “It’s a Wonderful Life,” are a rare breed of smart, dedicated public servants whose job has always been to keep the financial system safe and sound. As the complexity and risks of running a bank increase with the introduction of cryptocurrencies such as stablecoins and the move towards tokenization, the need for these examiners has never been greater. Yet, bank supervisors are leading a reduction-in-force that will further strain resources.

May was another month of uncertainty and market volatility, which continues a trend that bank treasurers have seen for longer than they can remember. In challenging times like these, bank treasurers prefer to sit in the bunker, holding cash, which is nothing different from what they have been doing for years. Hedging for rates down but unsure if they should be worrying about a rate-up scenario, bank treasurers take no comfort in the fact that Fed officials also continue to express uncertainty about the economic picture and the likely path for rates.

The earnings outlook for banks is encouraging just judging by Q1 2025 results, but the industry’s message to investors this month was that anything can happen and the rest of the year and all the key performance indicators they track are just too hard to predict. Bank treasurers continue to face a challenging landscape to navigate and a lot of risk they need to manage. They are sitting on a lot of cash waiting for clarity, but they are also studying the capabilities of the latest AI technology to improve their decision-making capabilities.

The banking industry continues to ramp up investment in GenAI and machine learning technology. While AI probably will never replace humans as the ultimate decision-makers, it offers to help them make better, more informed decisions. This month, the newsletter’s editorial staff decided to test out the state of this technology and created Jay AI, our very own Jerome Powell bot. The editor-in-chief posed key questions to see what it would answer on topics that bank treasurers have on their minds about interest rates and the economy, the future of bank supervision, and the direction of the Fed’s balance sheet.